<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome OS and Canonical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.canonical.com/2009/11/19/google-chrome-os-and-canonical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.canonical.com/2009/11/19/google-chrome-os-and-canonical/</link>
	<description>All the Canonical news that&#039;s fit to print</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 00:44:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: d4yw41k3r</title>
		<link>http://blog.canonical.com/2009/11/19/google-chrome-os-and-canonical/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>d4yw41k3r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.canonical.com/?p=294#comment-524</guid>
		<description>So Canonical is preparing to migrate all users from Firefox to Google Chrome. Baaaaad guys! http://forum.ubuntuusers.de/topic/du-benutzt-einen-nicht-unterstuetzten-browser/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Canonical is preparing to migrate all users from Firefox to Google Chrome. Baaaaad guys! <a href="http://forum.ubuntuusers.de/topic/du-benutzt-einen-nicht-unterstuetzten-browser/" rel="nofollow">http://forum.ubuntuusers.de/topic/du-benutzt-einen-nicht-unterstuetzten-browser/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mirsal Ennaime</title>
		<link>http://blog.canonical.com/2009/11/19/google-chrome-os-and-canonical/comment-page-1/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>Mirsal Ennaime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.canonical.com/?p=294#comment-486</guid>
		<description>Nice to hear that.

One thing though, I find your use of the word &quot;consumers&quot; a bit insulting.
We are human beings, not &quot;consumers&quot; !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to hear that.</p>
<p>One thing though, I find your use of the word &#8220;consumers&#8221; a bit insulting.<br />
We are human beings, not &#8220;consumers&#8221; !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ibbill</title>
		<link>http://blog.canonical.com/2009/11/19/google-chrome-os-and-canonical/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>ibbill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.canonical.com/?p=294#comment-484</guid>
		<description>I have a problem with helping google when they wont enable  the chrome browser along with picasa and google chat with video for ubuntu users to use.

Just my thoughts.

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a problem with helping google when they wont enable  the chrome browser along with picasa and google chat with video for ubuntu users to use.</p>
<p>Just my thoughts.</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wendell</title>
		<link>http://blog.canonical.com/2009/11/19/google-chrome-os-and-canonical/comment-page-1/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>wendell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.canonical.com/?p=294#comment-483</guid>
		<description>Good--and good to see that you&#039;re working with the Googleplex.  I was wondering how Ubuntu would fit in a post-Chrome world, because, as the announcement Thursday showed, Google can really, really suck up all the publicity oxygen.

Now, exactly what does that &quot;specialized hardware&quot; reference MEAN?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good&#8211;and good to see that you&#8217;re working with the Googleplex.  I was wondering how Ubuntu would fit in a post-Chrome world, because, as the announcement Thursday showed, Google can really, really suck up all the publicity oxygen.</p>
<p>Now, exactly what does that &#8220;specialized hardware&#8221; reference MEAN?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wesleyhg</title>
		<link>http://blog.canonical.com/2009/11/19/google-chrome-os-and-canonical/comment-page-1/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>wesleyhg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.canonical.com/?p=294#comment-482</guid>
		<description>UhUU! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UhUU! <img src='http://blog.canonical.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

